HIM: well in a lawless society i would be free to stalk you, break into your house and find out everything about you, wait inside your house after eating eveything in it, doing a bowl of crack and contemplate how i was going to beat your brains out with a cool assault tool i made using anarchist cookbook. after i beat your IQ down a few notches i would move on to the next shmuck that i fancied. after i rob you of everything you own and sell it on e-bay. still attracted to anarchy? hope not.
ME: Yea to anarchy...
YES I AM STILL INTERESTED IN ANARCHY. Do you honestly believe that the majority of people have the values that you give yourself in the anarchy scenario? To believe in such a flight of fantasy as what you portray is lunacy! In the ideal anarchy, you would not have had the opportunity to break into my house as my neighbors would be watching out for me and I for them. As for you stalking me, buddy I would be on you like white on rice. I pay attention to shit like that and pretty soon you would notice that I am stalking you. How would that make you feel?
Anarchy does not equate to chaos. If you have heard of game theory and the tit for tat and two tit for tat strategy, you would understand how it works. The two for one is better as it gives the benefit of the doubt as a first offense may be an error. However, once doubt has been removed...you are nailed by at least one person. If the process is a repeat process, you will then alienate yourself to all those around you. Would you like that? (FYI: http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/tittat/story.htm)
Feel free to respond. I dare you. No. I double dare you. BTW, do use merit when responding as I will look to poke holes in your words. You have my word on that.
~ Maggie
*NOVEMBER 3rd, 2008 ~ He has not responded as of yet. Buck, buck, buck akkk.
No comments:
Post a Comment